Over the years since the
accession of Jose Bergoglio to the Chair of Peter, in perusing the Huffington
Post blog, the National Catholic Reporter website and other “progressive”
social media, one gets the impression that these folks believe Francis (“Who Am
I to Judge?”) will revolutionize Catholic teaching on marriage. On these pages
I have frequently noted many of Francis’ statements affirming
traditional-Biblical-natural marriage, as well as his extremely strong remarks
back in Argentina, where he declared same-sex “marriage” a diabolical effort of
“the Father of Lies” to “destroy God’s plan … and deceive the children of God.”
He said then—only four years ago—that gay “marriage” discriminates against
children “in advance,” depriving them of “their human development given by a
father and a mother and willed by God.” At stake, said Cardinal Bergoglio, was
“the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts” and the very survival
of the human family, with Satan at work. I continue the effort here and here.
That’s a credit to him, that he at least had pangs of conscience; whereas these other orders, like the Jesuits, even when they saw that the IHMs were almost extinct, nevertheless they invited the same team in. Oh, yes. Well, actually we started with the Jesuits before we started with the nuns. We did our first Jesuit workshop in ‘65. Rogers got two honorary doctorates from Jesuit universities…. A good book to read on this whole question is Fr. Joseph Becker’s The Re-FormedJesuits. It reviews the collapse of Jesuit training between 1965 and 1975. Jesuit formation virtually fell apart; and Father Becker knows the influence of the Rogerians pretty well. He cites a number of Jesuit novice masters who claimed that the authority for what they did—and didn’t do—was Carl Rogers. Later on when the Jesuits gave Rogers those honorary doctorates, I think that they wanted to credit him with his influence on the Jesuit way of life. But do you think there were any short-term beneficial...

Comments
Post a Comment