Over the years since the
accession of Jose Bergoglio to the Chair of Peter, in perusing the Huffington
Post blog, the National Catholic Reporter website and other “progressive”
social media, one gets the impression that these folks believe Francis (“Who Am
I to Judge?”) will revolutionize Catholic teaching on marriage. On these pages
I have frequently noted many of Francis’ statements affirming
traditional-Biblical-natural marriage, as well as his extremely strong remarks
back in Argentina, where he declared same-sex “marriage” a diabolical effort of
“the Father of Lies” to “destroy God’s plan … and deceive the children of God.”
He said then—only four years ago—that gay “marriage” discriminates against
children “in advance,” depriving them of “their human development given by a
father and a mother and willed by God.” At stake, said Cardinal Bergoglio, was
“the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts” and the very survival
of the human family, with Satan at work. I continue the effort here and here.
Back in June of this year I wrote about Pope Francis' view of Gender identity : " Gender ideology is demonic!’” said the Holy Father. One thinks of this statement wonders what the New York Times thinks of t his statement by a Pope they admire after running this piece on gender identity . The article tells of how there are not only man and woman, but also other ‘genders;' furthermore: every person can choose his or her gender . Fr. Longenecker stands this on its head: " Well, call me old fashioned, but remember Humanae Vitae? The underlying teaching was a defense of the essentials of human sexuality. Basically “sex is for babies” and if you separate sex from babies all sorts of monstrous things will come about. When sex becomes more about recreation than pro creation people become confused about what sex is for, and if they’re confused about what sex is for, then they soon become confuse...

Comments
Post a Comment