I hope to live to see the day when the terms "liberal" and conservative" are no longer used to refer to membership in the Body of Christ. For example, Father Z has recently penned an analysis of the heterodox position on recent happenings involving Pope Francis, which makes use of these terms. The schema of “liberal” (progressive, left) vs.
conservative (traditionalist, right) which followed upon the close of Vatican
II is inadequate for understanding the present-day crisis of faith within
the Church of Jesus Christ, though it is most unfortunate that usage of these
terms persist among many Catholics and in the media today. Division within
Christ’s Church is a clear attack by the evil one. Satan’s strategy here is the
time-honored one of divide et impera -
divide and conquer. Remember, too, Jesus’ words to the Pharisees: “Every
kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will
stand.” What is a more fruitful way of looking at the Church today? I suggest that made up of members of the body who know Christ, and those who have yet to meet Him. More here.
Back in June of this year I wrote about Pope Francis' view of Gender identity : " Gender ideology is demonic!’” said the Holy Father. One thinks of this statement wonders what the New York Times thinks of t his statement by a Pope they admire after running this piece on gender identity . The article tells of how there are not only man and woman, but also other ‘genders;' furthermore: every person can choose his or her gender . Fr. Longenecker stands this on its head: " Well, call me old fashioned, but remember Humanae Vitae? The underlying teaching was a defense of the essentials of human sexuality. Basically “sex is for babies” and if you separate sex from babies all sorts of monstrous things will come about. When sex becomes more about recreation than pro creation people become confused about what sex is for, and if they’re confused about what sex is for, then they soon become confuse...

Comments
Post a Comment