That’s a credit to him, that he at
least had pangs of conscience; whereas these other orders, like the Jesuits,
even when they saw that the IHMs were almost extinct, nevertheless they
invited the same team in.
Oh,
yes. Well, actually we started with the Jesuits before we started with the
nuns. We did our first Jesuit workshop in ‘65. Rogers got two honorary
doctorates from Jesuit universities…. A good book to read on this whole
question is Fr. Joseph Becker’s The Re-FormedJesuits. It reviews the collapse of Jesuit training between 1965 and 1975.
Jesuit formation virtually fell apart; and Father Becker knows the influence
of the Rogerians pretty well. He cites a number of Jesuit novice masters who
claimed that the authority for what they did—and didn’t do—was Carl Rogers.
Later on when the Jesuits gave Rogers those honorary doctorates, I think that
they wanted to credit him with his influence on the Jesuit way of life.
But do you think there were any
short-term beneficial effects? Did it seem as if you were getting somewhere in
the good sense?
Well,
priests and nuns became more available to the people that they worked with;
they were less remote.... But we didn’t have a doctrine of evil. As I’ve said,
Maslow saw that we failed to understand the reality of evil in human life. When
we implied to people that they could trust their impulses, they also understood
us to mean that they could trust their evil impulses, that they weren’t really
evil. But they were really evil. This hit home again for Rogers in the 1970s,
when rumors began to circulate about a group that had spun off from ours. By
then we had become the Center for Studies of the Person in La Jolla, having
spun off from WBSI; and at the same time there spun off another group called
the Center for Feeling Therapy in Hollywood. Well, charges were brought against
the guys at the Center for Feeling Therapy—one of three founders of that, by
the way, being a Jesuit who had left the order—and among the things that the
State of California was perceptive enough to charge them with was killing
babies. Eleven times, women who became pregnant while they were in the
compound, the Center for Feeling Therapy, were forced to abort their babies.
The State of California charged them with this crime—
Was this before Roe v. Wade?
No,
this happened after Roe, but the State Medical Board held that it was unethical
for those men to force the women to have abortions, because those women wanted
their babies.
And this is a result of psychological
feeling therapy?
Yes….Humanistic
psychotherapy, the kind that has virtually taken over the Church in America,
and dominates so many forms of aberrant education like sex education, and drug
education, holds that the most important source of authority is within you,
that you must listen to yourself. Well, if you have a baby you’re carrying
under your heart, get rid of it. Women who came into the Center for Feeling
Therapy with I children were forced to put them up for adoption….
Is there an assumption in humanistic
psychology, a modernist, Teilhardish kind of assumption, that human nature has
altered, and therefore old values, old models, don’t apply?
I
don’t think that humanistic psychology assumes any alteration of human nature,
but rather John Dewey’s idea that because we live in times of rapid social
change, what we’ve always done is precisely what we should no longer do.
Sure.
Now
the odd thing is, we’ve been living in terms of Dewey’s theory for almost a
hundred years now. We’re living in Dewey’s past, and not in our own present.
That’s what makes a movement like Roger McCaffrey’s and Bill Marra’s so
progressive: it doesn’t pretend that the last fifty years have worked out very
well.244
