I began my book by taking note that many Catholics after Vatican II were told by pastors,
curates, religious or theologians that the sacred council had changed certain
aspects of Catholic theology or practice, and consequently had never read the documents
of Vatican II for themselves. So it is good to see the popular Catholic press publishing recent orthodox works on the council, but I still am of a mind that Catholics so as not to be hoodwinked, should read the documents for themselves! The manuscript is currently receiving a copy edit, and so I anxiously await the completion of the process, and...publication!
Back in June of this year I wrote about Pope Francis' view of Gender identity : " Gender ideology is demonic!’” said the Holy Father. One thinks of this statement wonders what the New York Times thinks of t his statement by a Pope they admire after running this piece on gender identity . The article tells of how there are not only man and woman, but also other ‘genders;' furthermore: every person can choose his or her gender . Fr. Longenecker stands this on its head: " Well, call me old fashioned, but remember Humanae Vitae? The underlying teaching was a defense of the essentials of human sexuality. Basically “sex is for babies” and if you separate sex from babies all sorts of monstrous things will come about. When sex becomes more about recreation than pro creation people become confused about what sex is for, and if they’re confused about what sex is for, then they soon become confuse...

Comments
Post a Comment