I began my book by taking note that many Catholics after Vatican II were told by pastors,
curates, religious or theologians that the sacred council had changed certain
aspects of Catholic theology or practice, and consequently had never read the documents
of Vatican II for themselves. So it is good to see the popular Catholic press publishing recent orthodox works on the council, but I still am of a mind that Catholics so as not to be hoodwinked, should read the documents for themselves! The manuscript is currently receiving a copy edit, and so I anxiously await the completion of the process, and...publication!
That’s a credit to him, that he at least had pangs of conscience; whereas these other orders, like the Jesuits, even when they saw that the IHMs were almost extinct, nevertheless they invited the same team in. Oh, yes. Well, actually we started with the Jesuits before we started with the nuns. We did our first Jesuit workshop in ‘65. Rogers got two honorary doctorates from Jesuit universities…. A good book to read on this whole question is Fr. Joseph Becker’s The Re-FormedJesuits. It reviews the collapse of Jesuit training between 1965 and 1975. Jesuit formation virtually fell apart; and Father Becker knows the influence of the Rogerians pretty well. He cites a number of Jesuit novice masters who claimed that the authority for what they did—and didn’t do—was Carl Rogers. Later on when the Jesuits gave Rogers those honorary doctorates, I think that they wanted to credit him with his influence on the Jesuit way of life. But do you think there were any short-term beneficial...

Comments
Post a Comment