....When I did return to the Faith, I was unable to find employment in
my undergraduate major, history, so I began to volunteer teaching CCD in my
parish, St. Agatha in Redford Twp., hoping eventually to land a job there teaching history. This required
me to earn catechist certification offered by the Archdiocese of Detroit, which
I did in 1978. No sooner had I completed the requirements, when a combination
Religion/History opening occurred at Benedictine High School in Detroit. I taught there for one year, after which I landed a job teaching
Scripture (for which I, by true Catholic standards, was woefully unprepared to
do) at St. Agatha, where I remained for one year. I then took a
position at a Catholic high school in a suburb of Detroit, where I have been
ever since. Since 1995, however, and my “reversion” (no doubt through the
prayers of my Mom) to the fullness of Catholic teaching, I have made ten year study of the post-conciliar years in the United States, for which my
training in history and as a catechist at the St. John Bosco Institute for
Catechetics, as well as twenty-five years as a catechist in the Archdiocese of
Detroit have come in handy. As to the book, there is very little that is
original; rather I offer a synthesis of much that I have read in the sources and in print regarding the years
immediately following the Second Vatican Council, though my interpretation of Paul VI on the state of the Church in 1972 I believe to be somewhat original. I decided to write the book out of my experiences as a catechist
(1978-2000) and a life-long student of history.
Back in June of this year I wrote about Pope Francis' view of Gender identity : " Gender ideology is demonic!’” said the Holy Father. One thinks of this statement wonders what the New York Times thinks of t his statement by a Pope they admire after running this piece on gender identity . The article tells of how there are not only man and woman, but also other ‘genders;' furthermore: every person can choose his or her gender . Fr. Longenecker stands this on its head: " Well, call me old fashioned, but remember Humanae Vitae? The underlying teaching was a defense of the essentials of human sexuality. Basically “sex is for babies” and if you separate sex from babies all sorts of monstrous things will come about. When sex becomes more about recreation than pro creation people become confused about what sex is for, and if they’re confused about what sex is for, then they soon become confuse...


Comments
Post a Comment