....When I did return to the Faith, I was unable to find employment in
my undergraduate major, history, so I began to volunteer teaching CCD in my
parish, St. Agatha in Redford Twp., hoping eventually to land a job there teaching history. This required
me to earn catechist certification offered by the Archdiocese of Detroit, which
I did in 1978. No sooner had I completed the requirements, when a combination
Religion/History opening occurred at Benedictine High School in Detroit. I taught there for one year, after which I landed a job teaching
Scripture (for which I, by true Catholic standards, was woefully unprepared to
do) at St. Agatha, where I remained for one year. I then took a
position at a Catholic high school in a suburb of Detroit, where I have been
ever since. Since 1995, however, and my “reversion” (no doubt through the
prayers of my Mom) to the fullness of Catholic teaching, I have made ten year study of the post-conciliar years in the United States, for which my
training in history and as a catechist at the St. John Bosco Institute for
Catechetics, as well as twenty-five years as a catechist in the Archdiocese of
Detroit have come in handy. As to the book, there is very little that is
original; rather I offer a synthesis of much that I have read in the sources and in print regarding the years
immediately following the Second Vatican Council, though my interpretation of Paul VI on the state of the Church in 1972 I believe to be somewhat original. I decided to write the book out of my experiences as a catechist
(1978-2000) and a life-long student of history.
MONDAY last I posted that Pope Francis might not be all that the secular media consider him to be, recommending a First Things piece on the matter. Today we read of Archbishop Chaput's interview with John Allen of the National Catholic (?) Reporter , in Rio for WYD. What caught my attention was the Archbishops's comment that alienated, non-serious Catholics perhaps interpret the Pope's openness as being less concerned than his predecessors with doctrine, and that it is already true that "the right wing of the Church" has not been happy with his election. As I argued in The Smoke of Satan , and as George Weigel has eloquently posited in Evangelical Catholicism , the political terms left and right are woefully inadequate as measurements of one's standing in the Body of Christ. There are only the orthodox, and the heterodox.
Comments
Post a Comment