Friday, August 21, 2015

Crisis in Crisis?

Ad for Tinder

Mark has a point in his FB share below, but I would go him one further when it comes to the breakdown of sanctity in traditional marriage: the part played by employment of artificial contraception, as JPII reminded us in Familiaris consortio:

When couples, by means of recourse to contraception, separate these two meanings [procreative and unitive] that God the Creator has inscribed in the being of man and woman and in the dynamism of their sexual communion, they act as "arbiters" of the divine plan and they "manipulate" and degrade human sexuality-and with it themselves and their married partner-by altering its value of "total" self-giving. Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality….

When, instead, by means of recourse to periods of infertility, the couple respect the inseparable connection between the unitive and procreative meanings of human sexuality, they are acting as "ministers" of God's plan and they "benefit from" their sexuality according to the original dynamism of "total" selfgiving, without manipulation or alteration.

No fault heterosexual divorce was the bullet to the brain of marriage. Gay "marriage" is just kicking the corpse. So the smart thing for Crisis Magazine to do is waste our time attacking faithful chaste Catholics like Joseph PreverEve Tushnet, and Joshua Gonnerman. ‪#‎eyeroll‬