Skip to main content

War of the Worlds

"So proud of my nephew Scott and the dialogue he started. He was responding to a teacher he had at his high school who still believes that homosexuality is a learned behavior. High school is a tough time anyway ... students don't need teachers making it even more difficult." -Susan Sarandon
In 1972 Pope Paul VI remarked:

We have the impression that through some cracks in the wall the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God: it is doubt, uncertainty, questioning, dissatisfaction, confrontation. And how did this come about? We will confide to you the thought that may be, we ourselves admit in free discussion, that may be unfounded, and that is that there has been a power, an adversary power. Let us call him by his name: the devil. We thought that after the Council a day of sunshine would have dawned for the history of the Church. What dawned instead was a day of clouds and storms, of darkness, of searching and uncertainties.

It was after reading this that I, reflecting on my experience in over 30 years in Catholic educational circles, decided to write The Smoke of Satan in the Temple of God, for I recognized the prophetic nature of Paul’s insight, never more obvious than the present day. Let us take the most obvious example of the doubt, uncertainty, questioning, dissatisfaction, and confrontation (signs of the diabolic) facing the Mystical Body of Christ, the People of God today- the happenings in the Archdiocese of San Francisco.

Op Ed from a San Francisco Chronicle columnist:

Supervisor Mark Farrell tried to be reasonable.

Maybe that’s where he went wrong.

At last week’s Board of Supervisors meeting, Farrell introduced a resolution pretty much to urge San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone to back off on the “morality clauses” he’s got his mind set on for local Catholic school teacher labor contracts and handbooks.

In a carefully worded statement, Farrell noted that he is a practicing Catholic who attended Catholic school. But he also said that he personally could not support the Archdiocese characterizing a list of practices as “gravely evil.” They included “homosexual relations” and “reproductive technology.” Nor, Farrell said, did he support changing the policy at Star of the Sea Church in the Inner Richmond to no longer allow young women to serve as altar girls.

The legislation doesn’t have any real teeth, of course, but it was a strong gesture. It passed the board unanimously.

So, finally, some adult discussion of the issues, right? Not so fast.

The day after the legislation was approved, the New York-based Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights sent out a letter written by President Bill Donohue announcing, “The Board of Supervisors ... declares war on the Archdiocese of San Francisco.” Donohue asked his group’s membership to “contact the author of the resolution ... Mark Farrell” and included Farrell’s e-mail address.

Last week the e-mails began to arrive — from out of town.

“I have received e-mails from Minnesota, New Jersey and Canada,” Farrell said. “But not a single one from San Francisco.”
And now that Farrell has shared some of the e-mails, let’s go out on a limb and say they are unlikely to change the minds of San Franciscans. The worst of them range from extreme to borderline loony.

“Your actions against the Archdiocese ... prove that the devil is very active in modern society,” one said. “I am sorry for you that you have willfully chosen to be his agent.”
“I can understand your sentiments because the temple dedicated to Satan is a major part of the city of San Francisco,” another wrote. “Where is Zorro when you need him?”

Um, Zorro?

OK, so we’re not going to have a logical, thoughtful conversation. Too bad, because there are some sensible points to be made.

“We have nondiscrimination laws here in San Francisco that have been established for years, including protecting the LGBT community,” Farrell said. “And by mandating that teachers conduct their public and private lives in a manner contrary to our laws in San Francisco, it becomes a civic and legal issue.”

That seems pretty straightforward. Same-sex marriage, for instance, is legal in the state of California, and marriage licenses are handed out daily in San Francisco and other cities.

The church can express disapproval if it wishes, but requiring teachers (some of whom may be LGBT) to be against it, even if it is contrary to their beliefs, isn’t going to fly.

Although Archbishop Cordileone also unsuccessfully tried to change their designation to ministers, these people are teachers. They’re employees. A hot dog stand in Oakland can’t require its employees to become fans of the Raiders. (Given the team’s recent history, maybe no one can.) And the Catholic Church can’t control the thoughts and opinions of its paid employees.
In the world of law and logic, that makes sense. Unfortunately, we’re in a parallel universe of noise, accusations and posturing. In that world, these kind of wild accusations — if you disagree with us, you must be supporting Satan — have currency.

Donohue and his organization, which bills itself as the nation’s largest Catholic civil rights organization, clearly loves this attention. As its mission statement says: “When slanderous assaults are made against the Catholic Church, the Catholic League hits the newspapers, television and radio talk shows, defending the right of the church to promote its teachings ...”

Among Donohue’s most recent press releases were complaints about the Netflix series “House of Cards” and Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show,”as well as a blog post headlined, “Obama panders to Muslim Americans.”

This is grandstanding on a national stage. Cordileone and the Catholic League aren’t trying to have a dialogue with San Franciscans. They’re throwing red meat to the vociferous conservatives who persist in thinking that they are just about to turn this whole LGBT thing around. Although the national momentum is going in the other direction — 37 states now permit same-sex marriage — they genuinely think they are making progress.

Good luck with that. I’ll keep my inbox open. Oh, and let me know if you hear from Zorro.

Zorro Replies:

 If the Catholic Church is to continue to teach timeless truths about the dignity of all human persons from conception to natural death, and the sanctity of marriage between one man and one woman, then she needs to begin to seriously participate in the spiritual war that has already been declared against her by those who wish to destroy these teachings.

In addition to the aforementioned San Francisco Board of Supervisors resolution,  Sam Singer, the head of a high priced Public Relations firm, was hired to wage war on Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone because of the archbishop’s strong defense of marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

In the Diocese of Scranton a fight began last week against a priest who alllowed a pro-life film, To Be Born, be shown a sixth grade CCD class. Described in the local newspaper as holding “rabid anti-abortion views,” the priest—a pastor who is beloved and greatly respected by his faithful parishioners at St. Monica’s Catholic Church—was labeled the PC intolerable— a “bully,” and has since said that he “showed poor judgment” in allowing the film to be shown. The teacher who presented the pro-life film has resigned,  under attack from parents because she had the temerity to disclose to her students that “not everyone goes to Heaven.”

I think the priest’s failure to engage in the battle, as has Archbishop Cordileone wonderfully in San Francisco, makes things harder for those of us on the front lines in the ongoing war on Catholic moral and social teaching.

When the media favors those who attack the Church, it makes the fight tougher; thus my support for the San Francisco shepherd. Archbishop Cordileone has been under siege since he arrived in San Francisco—but he has been courageously fighting a noble fight against an overwhelmingly greater force that wants the Church to just stay out of the conflict over same-sex “marriage.”

We go on. Recently I saw on Facebook that Patricia Jannuzzi, a religion teacher at Immaculata High School in the Diocese of Metuchen, NJ posted a statement supporting traditional marriage on her personal Facebook page. Angry same-sex “marriage” supporters, some of them Immaculata alumni, demanded that she be removed from her teaching position, and that the school address the “homophobic undertones in the school.” Creating a change.org petition called “Stop the Public Hate Speech of Teachers” alumnus Tom Robinson (class of 2001) posted: “I know that many of you want to see Mrs. Jannuzzi fired, but addressing the systemic problem of homophobic undertones in the school and publicly posted on social media is much more important than one person keeping her job.” So much for tolerance. For this gentleman, anyone—including a religion teaching at a Catholic high school—who refuses to support the goodness of homosexual acts is an enemy that must be destroyed.

I have prayed for this teacher who is indeed under seige. Much of the media—including the local newspapers—have described her Facebook post as a “rant.” She wrote: “We need healthy families with a mother and a father for the sake of the children and humanity!” and that “(gay activists) want to reengineer western civilization into a slow extinction.” In place of defending Jannuzzi for her willingness to defend Catholic teachings, the principal and the pastor of her school suspended her—sending a letter to alumni, parents and students apologizing for “any hurt this has  caused to any individuals and the negative light in which it has cast our school.”

What of the chief catechist and shepherd of the diocese? Bishop Paul G. Bootkoski  appeared to concur with these steps, saying that “the teacher’s comments were disturbing and do not reflect the Church’s teachings on acceptance…. Pope Francis reminds us that we are to accept all of our brethren. We must ensure that our educators steer away from harsh and judgmental statements that can alienate and divide us.”

What those who disagree with Januzzi want is for the Immaculata High School to stop teaching what the Church teaches about same sex behavior because they mistakenly view it as hateful. Remember, the devil is far more clever than the brightest human, except for the one to whom the keys have ben given, for, contrary to what Bishop Bootkoski says, in 2010, Pope Francis referred to the trend towards same-sex “marriage” as a movement that begins with the devil, cautioning us to “not be naïve: this is not simply a political struggle, but it is an attempt to destroy God’s plan. It is not just a bill (a mere instrument) but a move of the father of lies who seeks to confuse (emaphasis mine) and deceive the children of God.” Indeed one wonders, would the Holy Father be permitted to tech at Immaculata High? Pope Francis is on record as viewing same-sex “marriage” an “ideological colonization that we have to be careful about that is trying to destroy the family.” Pope Benedict XVI warned in 2012 that the policies which “undermine the family threaten human dignity and the future of humanity itself.” Jannuzzi on Facebook heroically resounded B16, who knew that this was a war not to be refused.

How to fight this battle of the war? Robert George advises parents of students at Immaculata High School to boycott the school until Mrs. Jannuzzi is fully reinstated. The suspension of a teacher who was recognized as deserving of the Regina Nostra medal by the diocesan bishop for her “love and devotion” to Immaculata High School and the parish—is proof that Immaculata High School is “not a fit place for your children.” Professor George has requested that others join this fight. I alredy have.  As of now Jannuzzi’s contract will not be renewed in the coming school year.


Catholic teaching precludes that there can ever be common ground on issues like abortion and same-sex “marriage,” and the Catholic Church has never existed in isolation from cultural conflicts. This doesn’t that the Church must be filled with hostility or resistant to all change. Just that she may never be guided by the changing values of a secular culture, the world that Our Lord has overcome. The Church cannot change her infallible teachings—the teachings of the Magisterium—including the dignity of the human person and the sacredness of the family. Thus, to the extent that secular forces engage the Church in combat, the culture wars will continue. Let us as Catholics be not conformed to this culture, but engage to transform it. Pope Francis warned us to be wary of “popular opinion” in an address to the members of the International Theological Commission. He said that while the Church must pay attention to the sensus fidelium, the Church should never confuse it with popular opinion on matters of faith, for, contrary what many heterodox argue, the sensus fidelium does not mean “majority opinion.” Francis knows, as his predecessors knew, that we are at war with a movement that began with the Fall of Man in the Garden, and will continue until the end of time. It is a war without end—but we are emboldened in the battles as long as we remember to give thanks to God who leads us in triumph in Christ Jesus.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This video of a young boy twerking at Pride has homophobes outraged | Gay Star News

DANCING WITH MR. D:   This video of a young boy twerking at Pride has homophobes outraged | Gay Star News : 'via Blog this'

Neomodernism's Attack on Religious Life- (continued).

Who’s that on page 180 of that book? This is Sister Mary Benjamin, IHM. Sister Mary Benjamin got involved with us in the summer of ‘66, and became the victim of a lesbian seduc­tion. An older nun in the group, “free­ing herself to he more expressive of who she really was internally,” decided that she wanted to make love with Sis­ter Mary Benjamin. Well, Sister Mary Benjamin engaged in this; and then she was stricken with guilt, and won­dered, to quote from her book, “Was I doing something wrong, was I doing something terrible? I talked to a priest—” Unfortunately, we had talked to him first. “I talked to a priest,” she says, “who refused to pass judgment on my actions. He said it was up to me to decide if they were right or wrong. He opened a door, and I walked through the door, realizing I was on my own.” This is her liberation? How excited they were, to be deliver­ing someone into God’s hands! Well, instead they delivered her into the hands of nondirective psychology. ...

Satan makes his way to us through the libido!

Let us take a great civilization historically devoid of pornography, and examine what happens once the door is opened a crack, for smoke to enter:

"The Spirit of Vatican II"

My advice to one confronted with doubt sown by those who make reference to “correct interpretations of Vatican II” is to reflect closely upon the words of John Paul II: With the Council, the Church first had an experience of faith, as she abandoned herself to God without reserve, as one who trusts and is certain of being loved. It is precisely this act of abandonment to God which stands out from an objective examination of the Acts. Anyone who wished to approach the Council without considering this interpretive key would be unable to penetrate its depths. Only from a faith perspective can we see the Council event as a gift whose still hidden wealth we must know how to mine . In short, it is this abandonment, this interpretive faith perspective that is woefully lacking in many who would offer to explain what the Council taught in “the spirit of Vatican II.” Watch here  to see what abandonment looks like!

From "The Smoke of Satan in the Temple of God"

….At the close of Vatican II, Pope Paul VI remarked that Christianity, the religion of God-Incarnate, had encountered the religion of man-made God. He was of the opinion that much of the Council was given over to demonstrating the compatibility of Enlightenment belief with Catholicism. Several years hence, on June 29, 1972, Paul delivered another assessment of the state of the Roman Catholic Church since the close of Vatican II. As Cardinal Silvio Oddi recalled it (in an article first published on March 17, 1990, in Il Sabato magazine in Rome) the Holy Father told a congregation: We have the impression that through some cracks in the wall the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God: it is doubt, uncertainty, questioning, dissatisfaction, confrontation. And how did this come about? We will confide to you the thought that may be, we ourselves admit in free discussion, that may be unfounded, and that is that there has been a power, an adversary power. Let us call him by his name: the...

Do Not Be Ashamed

T he demeaning and of Pope Benedict is quickening in combination with the growing exaltation of Pope Francis in the secular world and among the "progressive" dissidents within the Church. Thus I believe a little review of his Pontificate is in order, as the signs of the times required him to shoulder a heavy cross and suffer a quiet type of crucifixion due to his exceptional faith and courageous writings and actions. Pope Benedict took strong, long overdue and very necessary actions against moral corruption within the clergy, the religious orders and within Catholic aid agencies. He appointed many bishops faithful to the true Vatican II, and removed many who were a cause of scandal to the Church. He took actions on the liturgy and other issues that were not popular, but which he saw as essential to preserving Catholicism and Christian culture much as laid down in his The Spirit of the Liturgy. The full story of his papacy remains to be told. “And blessed is he who ...

My Intended Audience

I have written for those Catholics born and perhaps catechized before Vatican II or immediately thereafter who as yet are unaware of the true teaching of the Council. It should not surprise the reader that there are Catholics whose lifestyles do not differentiate them all that much from those who are not Catholic and/or Christian. Moreover, many Catholics of the “baby-boom” generation are alienated from the Church all together because their only exposure has been to a superficial, cultural Catholicism, impotent in the face of an American culture increasingly without faith. Conversely, many others have left the Church – hungrier, as they say, for a more “biblically-based church.” The book is also intended for young people of the “JP II” generation of Catholics, born long after the council but perhaps not fully aware of the turmoil spawned by dissent in the Church which, though on the wane, is still with us today. These young people, especially those in authentically Catholic college...

Being Catholic is ALWAYS Fun

“ F ive years ago, I would have been afraid of saying anything like what the pope said in his [recent] interview,”  the Rev. Tom Reese told Sally Quin . “I’m ecstatic. I haven’t been this hopeful about the church in decades....”  “It’s fun to be a religion reporter again. For a while it felt like being on the crime beat. It’s fun to be Catholic again.”  George Weigel has raised  the question of whether or not Fr. Tom has been paying attention throughout the last quarter of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st. Among his findings on the legacies of Pope Francis' predecessors: Fr. Thomas Reese, S.J. millions of adults have been baptized as or entered into full communion with the Catholic Church. new forms of campus ministry in the mold of JPII's "New Evangelization" have developed across the United States.  Catholic-studies programs have bloomed on genuinely Catholic campuses across the U.S.   the Church has produced the most c...

Popes are not Presidents...

John Allen of the Globe has opined today that there are two key words that capture why many church officials believe it’s so important to avoid what they regard as false expectations of swift change to the church’s ban on divorced and remarried Catholics receiving communion and the other sacraments: Humanae Vitae,  Paul VI's 1968 document reasserting the church’s traditional ban on birth control. It rocked the world, Allen writes, "in part because the reforming energies of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65) had led people to suspect change was just around the corner, in part because the pope himself had created a commission to study the issue." The o utcome of the Pope’s evential reassertion of the ban “soured public opinion on Pope Paul, in some ways inflicting a blow from which his papacy never really recovered. ” On matters related to marriage and the family, the Church has always seen the fertility of the husband and wife as a gift from God and the end ( telos...

On Marriage

Marriage comes to us from nature.  In Catholic teaching Jesus sanctifies marriage as a sacrament for the baptized, giving it significance beyond its natural reality. Traditionally the state has safeguarded marriage because it is indispensable to family and thus to the common good of society.  But neither Church nor State instituted marriage, and neither can change its nature. God created two mutually complementary sexes, able to transmit life through marital union.  Consummated sexual intercourse between a man and a woman is ideally based on mutual love and must always be based on mutual consent, if they are genuinely human actions.  No matter how strong a friendship or deep a love between persons of the same sex might be, it is physically impossible for two men, or two women, to consummate a marital union.  (In civil law, non-consummation of a marriage constitutes grounds for annulment). It is easy to see that sexual intercourse between a man and a w...