I am one of the generational Catholics
schooled in the Faith by the teaching of the Baltimore Catechism prior to
Vatican II, which the post-Vatican II religious education establishment branded as defective pedagogy. My quarrel with them is not over their
contention concerning the style of
teaching, but rather their view that the truths of the Catholic faith on the
existence and nature of God, the creation and Fall, the Incarnation and
Redemption, and the Church set down in the Baltimore Catechism were defective
as well. My experience after 36 years of teaching in Cathodic schools, all of them since Vatican II, is that CAtholic students are still doctrinally illiterate when compared with pre-Vatican II students. Here is proof.
MONDAY last I posted that Pope Francis might not be all that the secular media consider him to be, recommending a First Things piece on the matter. Today we read of Archbishop Chaput's interview with John Allen of the National Catholic (?) Reporter , in Rio for WYD. What caught my attention was the Archbishops's comment that alienated, non-serious Catholics perhaps interpret the Pope's openness as being less concerned than his predecessors with doctrine, and that it is already true that "the right wing of the Church" has not been happy with his election. As I argued in The Smoke of Satan , and as George Weigel has eloquently posited in Evangelical Catholicism , the political terms left and right are woefully inadequate as measurements of one's standing in the Body of Christ. There are only the orthodox, and the heterodox.
Comments
Post a Comment